Sometimes I think to myself “what were they thinking when they did that?”

This week’s Marketing Darwin award winner goes to the “dancing painter”.  (I cant even tell you the name of the company because the young man waving the sign was dancing and gyrating so much, that one could not make out the sign. I was in a hurry and could not stop but hope to return today snap a photo.)

I live the the Denver metro area and a “thing” which has become popular is companies hiring someone to stand on the corner and hold a sign, wave to traffic, in hopes that someone will stop in and see their RETAIL establishment. OK, maybe entertaining and cute but it’s horrible marketing.

I am not sure of the name of the chain of tax services who got the wheel rolling with this concept, but they would go the extra step of dressing the waving sign holder in a Statue of Liberty costume. Now you see on many corners a person standing or in this case dancing on the corner dressed in all kinds of garb, trying to get attention.

Here is why the dancing painter wins the award saved for those companies spending money and working their way to extinction.

Dancing on the corner, while cute, and possibly mildly entertaining, is a false interrupt. It may get the attention of a few people but  it does not hit the reticular activator of those who need their house painted. Since the young man was gyrating so much, I could not even read the same of the painting company. Sort of defeats the purpose.

Let’s pile on the rest of contributing factors that make this a winner:

  1. False interrupt – if I am looking for a painter, am I searching the corners of the intersections in my town for a resource? Nope.
  2. Does a dancing spokesperson teach me how to buy from this company? Hardly.
  3. Not sustainable -If by some miracle this did get my attention, I have no way of reestablishing the connection to this company. Since they are not a local retail operation located next to the where the young man was dancing, I cant just pop in.
  4. No follow on education – If i needed to know more, I can  rest assured the young man dancing knows nothing about painting, so stopping and asking him questions gets me no where.
  5. No differentiation – the dancing, while unique, does not teach me the consumer why this painting company is better than the rest. No education of benefit or value.
  6. Hardly scalable. Yes, unemployment is high but it’s unlikely that you could hire enough dancing sign wavers to grow the business at predictive pace.

I sure hope I can find this company again as it would be nice to help them realize this form of marketing could be one of the worst spends in marketing history.

Goes to show you, there is a marketing sucker born every day.

Rex Halbeisen on June - 13 - 2009

2 Responses to “The Dancing Painter”

  1. Lily Strange says:

    If the sign holder is wearing a costume, I might be amused. But I usually start thinking about how sweaty it would be inside the costume.
    Once when I was desperate for work I considered temporary employment as a “human directional.” (Yes, that’s what they’re called.) But I decided against it. Any dancing I would have been doing would have been because I needed a bathroom break and it would not have been pretty.
    The guy told me that his “human Directionals” got extra points for spinning the sign around and dancing and such. I never really thought about it, but that is pretty distracting. How can you read the sign if it’s being spun around.
    I’m pretty easy to entertain, though. I would be amused by a dancing submarine sandwich, for instance.

  2. I’ve seen the “wavers” and asked myself, would I hire that company because of that sign? Am I encouraged to stop and go check out that “going out of business” sale? The answer is always the same: No. But I keep seeing the effort, so is it like tele-marketing, and it gets just enough response to keep throwing at it? Thanks for the article.

Leave a Reply